• TH
    • EN
    • Register
    • Login
    • Forgot Password
    • Help
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forgot Password
  • Help
  • Contact
  • EN 
    • TH
    • EN
View Item 
  •   Home
  • สถาบันวิจัยระบบสาธารณสุข (สวรส.) - Health Systems Research Institute (HSRI)
  • Research Reports
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • สถาบันวิจัยระบบสาธารณสุข (สวรส.) - Health Systems Research Institute (HSRI)
  • Research Reports
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Situational Analysis of Social Participation in the Thai Health System

ศิญาณี หิรัญสาลี; Siyanee Hirunsalee;
Date: 2569-02
Abstract
This study analyzes the status, potential and operational gaps of Social Participation within the Thai health system. Utilizing the World Health Organization (WHO) framework and WHA Resolution 77.2, the research examines the mechanisms of five key organizations: (1) the National Health Commission Office (NHCO) (2) National Health Security Office (NHSO) (3) Thai Health Promotion Foundation (ThaiHealth) (4) Community Organizations Development Institute (CODI) and (5) Ministry of Public Health (MOPH). The findings indicate that while Thailand possesses strong legal foundations implementation often falls short. When applying Arnstein’s Ladder of Citizen Participation, most operations remain at the Consultation level. Although public input is solicited, it frequently lacks concrete implementation, reflecting Tokenism rather than genuine Citizen Power or partnership. A critical challenge identified is terminological ambiguity. The terms Participation and Engagement are often used interchangeably without clear operational definitions regarding the extent of power-sharing, creating a significant expectation gap between the state and the public. Furthermore, the system lacks effective feedback loops, causing proposals to disappear without response. The process also suffers from elite capture, where established civil society leaders dominate, excluding vulnerable groups and those with direct lived experiences. To address these issues, the study proposes four policy recommendations: 1) Standardize definitions and participation levels to align with international standards 2) Establish co-decision mechanisms to concretely devolve policy and budgetary power 3) Implement transparent feedback loops to rebuild social trust and 4) Invest in equity by empowering real problem owners to ensure sustainable health fairness.
Copyright ผลงานวิชาการเหล่านี้เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของสถาบันวิจัยระบบสาธารณสุข หากมีการนำไปใช้อ้างอิง โปรดอ้างถึงสถาบันวิจัยระบบสาธารณสุข ในฐานะเจ้าของลิขสิทธิ์ตามพระราชบัญญัติสงวนลิขสิทธิ์สำหรับการนำงานวิจัยไปใช้ประโยชน์ในเชิงพาณิชย์
Fulltext
Thumbnail
Name: hs3368.pdf
Size: 1.038Mb
Format: PDF
Download

User Manual
(* In case of download problems)

Total downloads:
Today: 1
This month: 1
This budget year: 1
This year: 1
All: 1
 

 
 


 
 
Show full item record
Collections
  • Research Reports [2558]

    งานวิจัย


DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Privacy Policy | Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 

Browse

HSRI Knowledge BankDashboardCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsSubjectsการบริการสุขภาพ (Health Service Delivery) [644]กำลังคนด้านสุขภาพ (Health Workforce) [102]ระบบสารสนเทศด้านสุขภาพ (Health Information Systems) [292]ผลิตภัณฑ์ วัคซีน และเทคโนโลยีทางการแพทย์ (Medical Products, Vaccines and Technologies) [129]ระบบการเงินการคลังด้านสุขภาพ (Health Systems Financing) [164]ภาวะผู้นำและการอภิบาล (Leadership and Governance) [1345]ปัจจัยสังคมกำหนดสุขภาพ (Social Determinants of Health: SDH) [235]วิจัยระบบสุขภาพ (Health System Research) [28]ระบบวิจัยสุขภาพ (Health Research System) [23]

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Privacy Policy | Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV